• Home Interface Controller

    Sunstein has prosecuted a portfolio of patents devoted to the emerging industry of interactive television. Our client ICTV has developed technology that enables cable television subscribers to receive video programming that allows them to interact with their television to play games, videos and music on demand; browse news, sports and weather; and view targeted interactive advertising.

  • Molecular Diagnostic System

    We obtained the patent for Source Precision Medicine’s molecular diagnostic system that measures cellular gene expression with significant precision to assess and track an individual’s current health, disease status and response to drug therapy, potentially a foundation for the future practice of medicine.

  • Acoustic Analysis of Bone

    Patents prosecuted by Sunstein protect technologies, including transient signal processing techniques developed by the Metra Biosystems division of Quidel Corp., that are used in compact ultrasonic devices to measure bone density as an aid in detecting osteoporosis.

  • Magnetization Technology

    Sunstein successfully negotiated a multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of Comair Rotron, following a jury verdict that our client’s patent was infringed. The patent was directed to important magnetization technology for brushless DC electric motors.

Juries. Patents. Success.

Comair Rotron, Inc. v Matsushita Electric Corp. of America

We obtained a $25 million judgment against industry giant Panasonic for willful infringement of our client Comair’s patents on fans for electronic equipment.

Exergen Corporation vs. Kaz, USA, Inc.

Sunstein lawyers won a $14.6M verdict for patent infringement following a two-week jury trial for our client Exergen, the people who pioneered the temporal artery thermometer.

Gates Formed-Fibre Products, Inc. v. Delaware Valley Corp.

By persuading a jury that the patents in suit were invalid, we successfully defended our client against accusations of infringement concerning a process for making fused-back automotive carpeting.

Winning at Post Grant Proceedings

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Arendi  S.A.R.L.

Samsung attacked our client’s patent in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) on grounds of obviousness. We persuaded the PTAB that an element of the claims was not disclosed by the cited references and thus prevented the inter partes review from even being instituted.

Click here for our Inter Partes Review flowchart, which shows a comprehensive timeline of deadlines and steps in an IPR proceeding.

Spotlight on Patents

diagram1 For our client Dr. Leslie Stern of Fall River, Massachusetts, we recently obtained US Patent No. 8,460,310, describing a medical device for use in minimally invasive spine surgery.

In the News

Our Latest Thinking

  • How much control can a patent owner retain over the use or resale of a product covered by his patent? The Federal Circuit’s answer raises shades of the first-sale doctrine under copyright law.

    More...
  • Will patent holders ever catch a break in defending against validity challenges in the patent office? Apparently not: Recent decisions give challengers a second bite at the apple–in federal court.

    More...
  • The patent office and the federal courts interpret patent claims according to different standards. The Federal Circuit harmonizes the disparity, but the Supreme Court may soon take a different view.

    More...
  • These are the high points of the new trademark regulations that the European Union has just put into effect.

    More...
  • Any U.S. company that receives personal data from EU businesses should know about the demanding new Privacy Shield rules.

    More...

Free Subscription

See more in Publications/News