Deep Patent & Trial Experience
We participated in the representation of Ariad, obtaining a $65 million jury verdict for infringement of our client’s patents for regulating NF-kappaB cell-signaling activity, the largest verdict in Massachusetts that year.
After securing a jury verdict of patent infringement, we negotiated a multimillion dollar settlement for our client Comair Rotron. The patent was directed to important magnetization technology for brushless DC electric motors.
In disputes over brand names, we have also delivered major successes to our clients.
Winning at IPRs
Motorola Mobility LLC, Google Inc., and Apple Inc. v. Arendi S.A.R.L.
Motorola, Google and Apple attacked the same patent as Samsung raising several additional grounds. Our arguments carried the day and the inter partes review was not instituted, freeing our client’s patent for unfettered assertion in court.
Spotlight on PatentsFor our client Dr. Leslie Stern of Fall River, Massachusetts, we recently obtained US Patent No. 8,460,310, describing a medical device for use in minimally invasive spine surgery.
In the News
Congratulations to our pro bono client GoodWeave and its founder, Kailash Satyarthi, on Mr. Satyarthi’s receipt of the 2014 Nobel Peace Prize. More. . .
Steven Saunders is on the faculty for the course “How to Become a Successful Physician Inventor.”
We delivered a win for our client American Science and Engineering in an interference proceeding against Rapiscan Systems. More. . .
Lisa Tittemore has been selected as one of the Women Leaders in Law and will be recognized this Fall in Fortune Magazine.
Bruce Sunstein was honored to be invited, along with some of America’s foremost entrepreneurial leaders, to the President of the Republic of Korea’s “Leaders’ Meeting for a Creative Economy.”
Our Latest Thinking
The Supreme Court curtails the Federal Circuit’s long-running practice of considering claim construction anew on appeal. Greater deference to trial judges must now be shown.More...
Patent validity can be challenged both in the Patent Office and in court. Isn’t it confusing if a different standard of claim construction applies in each forum? The Federal Circuit is unperturbed.More...
In the wake of Supreme Court rulings unfriendly to software patents, the Federal Circuit sends out a ray of hope that not all such inventions can be rejected as abstract ideas.More...
Premature public use of an invention can deprive an inventor of the right to a patent. What happens if the public use results from foul play by secretive villains? The Federal Circuit answers that question.More...
Recent developments in trademark law involve .sucks domain names; “tacking” of variant marks; preclusive effect of TTAB rulings; and Romanian soccer.More...
The preparation of course packs for college students raises thorny fair-use questions under copyright law, thornier still when state universities are involved.More...