• Home Interface Controller

    Sunstein has prosecuted a portfolio of patents devoted to the emerging industry of interactive television. Our client ICTV has developed technology that enables cable television subscribers to receive video programming that allows them to interact with their television to play games, videos and music on demand; browse news, sports and weather; and view targeted interactive advertising.

  • Molecular Diagnostic System

    We obtained the patent for Source Precision Medicine’s molecular diagnostic system that measures cellular gene expression with significant precision to assess and track an individual’s current health, disease status and response to drug therapy, potentially a foundation for the future practice of medicine.

  • Acoustic Analysis of Bone

    Patents prosecuted by Sunstein protect technologies, including transient signal processing techniques developed by the Metra Biosystems division of Quidel Corp., that are used in compact ultrasonic devices to measure bone density as an aid in detecting osteoporosis.

  • Magnetization Technology

    Sunstein successfully negotiated a multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of Comair Rotron, following a jury verdict that our client’s patent was infringed. The patent was directed to important magnetization technology for brushless DC electric motors.

Patents. Juries. Success.

Exergen Corporation vs. Kaz, USA, Inc.

Sunstein lawyers won a $14.6M verdict for patent infringement following a two-week jury trial for our client Exergen, the people who pioneered the temporal artery thermometer.

Abbott Laboratories v Syntron Bioresearch, Inc.

In a case involving immunoassay technology, we obtained a jury verdict of patent infringement and a permanent injunction on behalf of Abbott Laboratories.

Our successful advocacy extends to patent reexaminations and interferences.

Winning at Post Grant Proceedings

Apple Inc., Google Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC v. Arendi S.A.R.L.

We won a rare Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reversal of an IPR decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which had invalidated our client’s patent claims. The Federal Circuit accepted our argument that the Board had improperly relied on a “common sense” observation to invalidate Arendi’s patent.

Click here to learn more about Sunstein litigators.

Spotlight on Patents

A recent patent we obtained for our client Nexsan, of Santa Clara, CA,  U.S. Patent No. 9218406 covers a private cloud storage system in which security is maintained by storing the data on devices (sold under the Transporter brand) of  individual users.  Data is shared on a peer-to-peer basis.  A central  server governs access based on user privileges without storing any of  the shared data. This patent has issued in one of the fields in which recent court rulings have been propelling rapid evolution of the law.

In the News

Our Latest Thinking

  • Christopher Lacenere, Ph.D.

    PTAB Alert: On rare occasions, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board will reconsider its decision declining to institute an inter partes review (IPR). It helps if you can show that the judges misapplied a relevant legal doctrine.

    More...

  • Bruce D. Sunstein

    Through artful interpretation of the Supreme Court’s rigid guidelines in Alice (2014) for determining patent-eligibility, the Federal Circuit has recently offered patent protection to once seemingly endangered inventions.

    More...

  • Robert M. Asher

    Amending a patent claim in the midst of an inter partes review (IPR) is still hard for a patent owner, but the Federal Circuit has just made it a bit easier.

    More...

  • Thomas C. Carey

    Get your IPR arguments right the first time: The patent office sees objectionable unfairness in second-bite challenges to a patent’s validity.

    More...

  • Thomas J. Tuytschaevers

    Federal Circuit warns: If the patent office sees reason to reject patent claims for obviousness, it had better articulate that reason better than it has been accustomed to.

    More...

  • Brandon Scruggs

    The Eastern District of Texas has embraced its longtime status as a patent owner’s favorite trial court. The Federal Circuit has now cautioned that court to take seriously last summer’s Supreme Court decision restricting where corporations can be sued.

    More...

  • Thomas C. Carey

    An arbitration clause in a patent license cannot be avoided even when the licensee calls the patent’s validity into question.

    More...

  • Gozde Guckaya

    Read our roundup of IP cases on this season’s Supreme Court docket.

    More...

Free Subscription

See more in Publications/News